× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



A former employer used to send select managers there. We always referred to
it as "going off to charm school."


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Nelson
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:24 PM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: Performance question and SQL SERVER

http://www.dalecarnegie.com/

Paul Nelson
Cell 708-670-6978
Office 512-392-2577
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of TheBorg
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:51 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Performance question and SQL SERVER

I was working for a client in Ft Worth a few years back.

One of their employees was an oil & gas accountant who came from a mainframe

environment, and at every turn he was complaining about the slowness of the
AS/400 (OK - this was in the 90's...).

One day when mr. mainframe accountant was bellyaching about the slowness of
the system, I used WRKACTJOB and sequenced the display by CPU %, showing
that *he* was utilizing 95 % of the CPU by running a Query/400
interactively.

My response to him was "It would not be so slow if there wasn't an asshole
tkaing 95 percent of the CPU by running a query interactively!"
His response back to me was "You don't know *me* well enough to insult me!".

I didn't get fired, and we later became friends... ;-D

-sjl



"D*B" wrote in message
news:mailman.5780.1369938121.7202.midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx...

@Charles:

maybe we have very diffrent roles in projects and our experiences are very
diffrent...

my role ist mostly, that somebody complains about lousy db2/400 performance
or is saying: "this report takes more than ..., we need it within ...
and --- my custumors want to have answers within two days maximum => no time

for playing around with nice toys!!!
@MTI: there is no reference to the originating queries, I have no choice to
make them persistent, there is no controll over keeping and deleting
@PlanCache: I didn't find any usefull information in the plancache,
regardless how often I delete it.
@Index Advisory files: ROTFL 99% rubbish!!!

have a nice evening

D*B

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.