×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 26 Feb 2013 12:46, Matt Olson wrote:
Why does it need to be object based?
Not a /need/ Just that if it were, that could resolve the issue. The
point was to emphasize that the IBM i OS, which is object-based, would
not be fooled by what is the /object type/ just because the name did not
match some pre-supposed naming convention. I am pretty sure nobody has
renamed a program such that henceforth EDTF or SQL was able to access
the instruction stream as file data;-)
A good image viewing program won't care what the file extension is
and interrogate the file header to determine what type of file it
is.
Yet another strange concept; that the data in a file should define
the /type of file/ :-( I am sure someone with a virus to spread is
happy about that design however.
That concept is just a progression from the recognition that
"file-extensions are not good enough". So instead, the data must tell
the application what the data is. While that can work mostly, the
inherent flaw is conspicuous; i.e. the application fails with "Well, it
looked like what I know how to deal with, but somehow I got lost
processing this data and have now given up gracefully and thus presented
a nice message [or perhaps more likely as I have seen described and have
even experienced, a nasty crash] ;-) "
If anything is the blame here it's content manager for completely
bastardizing the files, storing overlays in an undocumented format,
and only allowing 8 meta data fields to fill in data into!
I know too little to comment intelligently... As my first reply
apparently had already revealed :-)
Regards, Chuck
CRPence Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:34 PM
Ah. So having suggested the name is "like B01291AA.BID" is even
more variable that I had inferred from the description. Ah well. If
the PC OS was object-based, it would be moot. Such a strange
concept that a file extension should define the /type/ of object
:-(
So I guess double-clicking the file name, even on the PCs with the
CM client installed will have no idea what to do with the .BID
file? And the only way to deal with the managed content is via the
view provided by the CM client.?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.