qgpl -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: qgpl
From: A Paul <amandapaul1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:23:36 +0000 (GMT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Just looking for some opinion here whether QGPL should be part of the user library list(for test environment), I believe it can invalidate tests and can have other impacts.
I know IBM created QGPL to contain some objects that are necessary for the system to perform effectively.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: qgpl , Porterfield, Sean

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.