Re: SSD Best practices -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: SSD Best practices
From: Ken Sims <mdrg8066@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:25:20 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:48:44 -0600, Gqcy <gmufasa01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

if I would have, for example, 32GB main storage and 2TB of disk
What would be be better bang for the buck:

I could upgrade my main storage to 128GB or 256GB for the same price
I could get 512GB of SDD???

Unless there was actually a need for more DASD, personally I would
lean for as RAM as I could afford.

Ken
Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views
of my employer or anyone in their right mind.

Follow-Ups:

Re: SSD Best practices , Jim Oberholtzer

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.