Re: A different SQL question, on a different SQL project -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: A different SQL question, on a different SQL project
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:40:41 -0800 (PST)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

But is there a way to do the same with RUNSQLSTM, either creating a
view that will always be based on the PFs in the same library ...

You're not hard-coding library names in your DDL source members, are you? We just change our library list and RUNSQLSTM for each.

-Nathan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: A different SQL question, on a different SQL project , James H. H. Lampert

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.