× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



You would have needed to have a comm trace running a week ago. :-)

- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

www.frankeni.com
www.iDevCloud.com
www.iInTheCloud.com

On 1/11/2013 10:21 AM, John McKee wrote:

Thanks Rob.

I am not authorized to the CMNTRC commands. I used the second option
you presented. Network guy thinks that nothing is using 172.x.x.x. I
found three connections. A bit tedious. Using the CMNTRC commands
would be helpful. But, won't they only show an active connection? Is
there any way to see a connection that was made maybe a week ago?

John McKee

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:45 AM, <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
STRCMNTRC
PRTCMNTRC CFGOBJ(LANLIN)
CFGTYPE(*LIN)
FMTTCP(*YES)
TCPIPADR('172.x.x.x')

- or -

NETSTAT *CNN
F13=Sort by column
Local Address
5=Display details
If the local address is * then that port is binding to all your
interfaces. You may get by with just one interface.
Keep using option 5 until you hit ones beginning with 172.

If the networker is just trying to clear up the port, you could move the
interface off of the one NIC on to the other. Initially sounded strange
to me to have multiple subnets on one NIC but it's doable.

Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1
Group Dekko
Dept 1600
Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





From: John McKee <jmmckee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 01/11/2013 09:36 AM
Subject: Two network cards
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx



Some time back, a second network card was added to our i. One card is
on 172.x.x.x and the other is on 10.x.x.x.

Most activity is now off the i, compared to what was there last October.

Network guy wants to shut down the 172.x.x.x address.

Is there a way to determine if that address is still used by somebody?
Even if not at a particular moment?

The other option is to shut down the 172.x.x.x and wait for the calls
to come in.


John McKee
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.