Re: Two network cards

[DrFranken <midrange@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You would have needed to have a comm trace running a week ago. :-)

        - Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

www.frankeni.com
www.iDevCloud.com
www.iInTheCloud.com

On 1/11/2013 10:21 AM, John McKee wrote:

> Thanks Rob.
>
> I am not authorized to the CMNTRC commands.  I used the second option
> you presented.  Network guy thinks that nothing is using 172.x.x.x.  I
> found three connections.  A bit tedious.  Using the CMNTRC commands
> would be helpful.  But, won't they only show an active connection?  Is
> there any way to see a connection that was made maybe a week ago?
>
> John McKee
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:45 AM,  <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > STRCMNTRC
> > PRTCMNTRC CFGOBJ(LANLIN)
> >            CFGTYPE(*LIN)
> >            FMTTCP(*YES)
> >            TCPIPADR('172.x.x.x')
> >
> > - or -
> >
> > NETSTAT *CNN
> > F13=Sort by column
> > Local Address
> > 5=Display details
> > If the local address is * then that port is binding to all your
> > interfaces.  You may get by with just one interface.
> > Keep using option 5 until you hit ones beginning with 172.
> >
> > If the networker is just trying to clear up the port, you could move the
> > interface off of the one NIC on to the other.  Initially sounded strange
> > to me to have multiple subnets on one NIC but it's doable.
> >
> > Rob Berendt
> > --
> > IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1
> > Group Dekko
> > Dept 1600
> > Mail to:  2505 Dekko Drive
> >            Garrett, IN 46738
> > Ship to:  Dock 108
> >            6928N 400E
> >            Kendallville, IN 46755
> > http://www.dekko.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:   John McKee <jmmckee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To:     Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > Date:   01/11/2013 09:36 AM
> > Subject:        Two network cards
> > Sent by:        midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Some time back, a second network card was added to our i.  One card is
> > on 172.x.x.x and the other is on 10.x.x.x.
> >
> > Most activity is now off the i, compared to what was there last October.
> >
> > Network guy wants to shut down the 172.x.x.x address.
> >
> > Is there a way to determine if that address is still used by somebody?
> >   Even if not at a particular moment?
> >
> > The other option is to shut down the 172.x.x.x and wait for the calls
> > to come in.
> >
> >
> > John McKee
> > --
> > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> > list
> > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> >
> >
> > --
> > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.