×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




IMHO adding 'on Power Systems' leverages that brand recognitions and clarifies for the unknowing that it doesn't run on inferior technology. Given the incredible benefits we got from merging System i and System p into POWER that's worth mentioning. Do I do it every time? Of course not, mostly IBM i stands alone.

- DrF

On 12/12/2012 12:55 PM, Peter Dow wrote:
Doesn't "IBM i on POWER systems" imply either limitation "IBM i only
runs on POWER systems, nothing else", or the possibility of IBM i on
other hardware, but it's somehow different? "IBM i on AMD systems"?

Do I have to say "Windows on Intel", "Ubuntu on AMD", "Android on
Snapdragon"?

Going farther afield, "Camry on Toyota chassis", "F150 on Ford"?

Anything wrong with just "IBM i"?

--
*Peter Dow* /
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 793-9050
petercdow@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:petercdow@xxxxxxxxx>
pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>/




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.