Re: Object use vs. library use

[CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>]

  The term "object usage information" has long been used generically to 
refer to all of the *FULL OIR [Object Information Record] details that 
show "activity"; i.e. the equivalent of the DSPOBJD DETAIL(*FULL) 
"Change/Usage information".  The term is not intended to equate with 
object *used* information [i.e. "last used" and "days used" and its 
"Reset date"].  That intended definition should be somewhat evident, 
conspicuous even, by the parenthetical commentary in the quoted 
documentation.  That documentation means to suggest that either of the 
described APIs [but not the object names] can be used to update either 
of the two separate categories of "object usage information"; i.e. some 
portion of the "Change/Usage information".  That documentation does 
*not* mean to suggest that both of those APIs would effect an update of 
the "used" information for the specified UsrSpc name.

  So IMO perhaps the doc could be called somewhat deceptive, but not 
"incorrect"; a misunderstanding arising in part due to a terminology 
issue, for which a reader feedback probably could be submitted to 
request the terminology be clarified.  Or perhaps suggesting that the 
documentation should state explicitly that the "change" API updates only 
the "changed" information and that the "retrieve" API updates only the 
"used" information.