×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 11 Oct 2012 06:11, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
<<SNIP>>
You will not be able to do a RGZPFM on this file itself due to
Allow write operation . . . . . . . . . . . : No
That is not a restriction for RGZPFM ALWCANCEL(*NO); i.e. the
old-style reorganize does not use a 'write' method. Long ago [when the
old-style reorganize was the only implementation] the RGZPFM was
prevented only due to both the restrictive authority [i.e. only a user
with *ALLOBJ authority would be able to perform the request on all but
one of the *DBXREF PF] and that those files are effectively _always_
open by the QDBSRVXR and QDBSRVXR2 system jobs such that even in a
restricted state no other job would be able to obtain the exclusive lock
necessary to perform the reorganize request.
The OS database did [over my objections] change to enable the
Reorganize Physical File Member request against the System Database
Cross-Reference files. However that was to be used only in extreme
emergencies when very few active rows\records exist; i.e. solely to
reclaim an abnormally large number\percentage of deleted records.... and
only in restricted state. I am unsure if initially the capability had
at least been restricted to only restricted state, but surely made no
attempt to prevent a request that could possibly take many hours more
than a reclaim of the *DBXREF data. And at least in its original
implementation, if the reorganize request was canceled, the likely
effect was deletion of the file being reorganized and all of its
dependent logical [VIEW; including system and library-specific SQL
catalog] files for which the recovery might be a complete PITA depending
on the individual customer requirements\desires. Had the implementation
changed to effect the RGZPFM within the job which normally would
maintain the open file [I know not, or perhaps just recall not], then
probably the latter negative effects would no longer be a potential
issue, but the former negative effect of an excessively long request
would probably remain as a potential issue.
<<SNIP>>
The way to fix that is to bring your system down into a restricted
state and run:
RCLSTG SELECT(*DBXREF)
That is AFaIK still the recommended method to effect the reset and
refresh of the data in all [except the RDB user-maintained] of the
*DBXREF physical files. On most systems, that reclaim request would
complete much quicker, even if possibly not more efficiently, than the
_discouraged_ reorganize request of any of those files using RGZPFM
ALWCANCEL(*NO). Limited-time repeated requests using ALWCANCEL(*YES)
and ENDRQS [via SysRqs-2], if supported, likely would be best effected
in periods when little non-QTEMP database file delete\create was active
[in both the *SYSBAS and any particular independent ASP] where the
action is deemed necessary\valuable.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.