× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



You said they are replicating the application. Does that mean they intend
to replicate the database, or just the application? You already have the
database setup. Just have the .net application read your files, The data
is then real time.
If the programming language is still up for debate. It is not hard to
create display only web applications using RPG, EGL or PHP that runs
natively on the I-series.
Our .NET developers that use I-series data read our files, we do not
replicate them to another server. The only replication I can think of is
the data warehouse reading files from many different systems.




From:
"Stone, Joel" <Joel.Stone@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
"'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:
10/05/2012 09:26 AM
Subject:
replicating an I-series home-grown application to a .net platform
Sent by:
midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx



My company is replicating our I-series home-grown application to a .net
platform for read-only. This .net app will provide customers with a
typical web-based myAccount view as seen on many websites.

I have two questions for this forum:


1) For the read-only mirrored version on .net, does it make sense to
have referential integrity (RI) constraints on file relationships? Either
from a purist database design standpoint or from a common business rules
standpoint? It seems to me that one HAS to assume that the source app has
R-I that is intact, and it seems to be asking for trouble and headaches to
try to enforce RI on a mirrored system that is read-only. This will
require file loads and updates in a certain sequence, which could be
problematic IMO.


2) Do other companies try to replicate an app onto another platform
in almost real-time? It seems that it would be SOoooo much simpler to
read the Iseries DB directly. Is this replication a common practice
today? Or is it more suited to the 1990's?




______________________________________________________________________
This outbound email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs
Skyscan service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.