× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Right, 254-263 is the JOB USER attribute. You want Current User...

D CURR_USER 358 367 * Current user
D * profile

-Eric DeLong

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Lampert
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 1:34 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: PROBLEM, Re: Almost a year and a half ago, I did some work with SQL UDFs.

Oh, boy, I just discovered some trouble.

As it turns out, I still have a censored view from my previous experiments.

The censorship, based on current signed-on user (as derived from the PGSDS)
D SDS
D LIB 81 90
D DUSER 254 263

works perfectly if I open the view with QuestView, or if I open the view
with STRSQL.

But if I look at the view from Squirrel SQL, through a JDBC connection,
the censorship doesn't work: I see records I'm not supposed to.

I see a QZDASOINIT job with these attributes (I've censored references
to my own user profile):

Display Job Status Attributes

Job: QZDASOINIT User: QUSER Number: 031575

Status of job . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ACTIVE
Current user profile . . . . . . . . . . . : <my-user-profile>
Job user identity . . . . . . . . . . . . . : <my-user-profile>
Set by . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : *DEFAULT

I get the feeling that the PGSDS of my service program is returning
QUSER instead of my own user profile (with which I established the JDBC
connection).

How do I get around that, so the censorship function acts on the correct
user profile?

And I suppose this kills DETERMINISTIC, since the JDBC runs in a
prestart job. Or is there a way that the call to the UDF

WHERE CENSORACCT(U01430, U01429) = 'P'

in the view definition itself can pass (as somebody else suggested) the
user ID?

(And note, U01430 and U01429 are not user profile names; they're numbers
associated with user profiles).

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.