RE: New COMMON Conference

["Paul Nelson" <nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

<< I think airlines use a "gui" that shows only characters.>>

The terminals most of them use have no mice/mousse/meese. :-)) 

Budget car rentals is trying to make the switch from their old iSeries
system to a gui system, but the users at the counters prefer to use the
green screen.

Paul Nelson
Cell 708-670-6978
Office 512-392-2577
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Raul A. Jager W.
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 8:17 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: New COMMON Conference

I think airlines use a "gui" that shows only characters.
And that is what I'm using in some data entry, but there is some 
javascript programming.
It is hard to tell without seen the actual data, but I think you can 
write a web intreface that will accept the same keys that the 5250. As a 
bonus, it can give you  some data validation in the browser.


Paul Nelson wrote:

> You'd have to show me that one. As for speed, why do most airline counters
> still use a character interface system?
>
> Paul Nelson
> Cell 708-670-6978
> Office 512-392-2577
> nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Raul A. Jager W.
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 5:41 PM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Re: New COMMON Conference
>
> It used to be that the green screen was faster for some kinds of work.
> But now you can do a web interface, (as litle friendly as the green 
> screen) and faster than any typist.
>
> Paul Nelson wrote:
>
>  
>
> > FWIW, for a construction company, nothing beats a green screen for banging
> > in time cards and invoices.
> >
> > Paul Nelson
> > Cell 708-670-6978
> > Office 512-392-2577
> > nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Klement
> > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:19 PM
> > To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> > Subject: Re: New COMMON Conference
> >
> >
> > FWIW.... I agree with your users.  When I see green screen, I go 
> > "ewwwwww", too.
> >
> > However, I don't like that you are associating GreenScreen=IBMi, and 
> > GUI=Windows.
> >
> > You can (and should!) write GUI apps on IBM i.  I've been telling people 
> > to do that for 10+ years.  Your users shouldn't know or care where the 
> > data resides... what they should know/care about is that it's stable, 
> > and always there when they need it.  And IBM i excels at that.
> >
> > Take iPhone, iPad, Android phones, Blackberries...   all easy to use GUI 
> > interfaces, none of them are Windows in any way shape or form.  How 
> > about XBox, Wii, PS3... all easy to use GUI devices, no Windows involved.
> >
> > IBM i can be a major player in that world too, using GUI technologies 
> > like web.  The only reason you still code green screens is because you 
> > (or someone else in your environment) has made that choice.
> >
> > Note that we actively discourage green-screen sessions at COMMON.  (Much 
> > more so than Richard's .NET sessions!)
> >
> >
> > On 8/16/2012 3:51 PM, Gerald Kern wrote:
> >
> >
> >    
> >
> > > I understand completely Scott... and I know that Common is pretty 'IBM
> > > centric'.
> > >
> > > Our business is in a growth spurt and we have new users coming from
> > >   
> > >
> > >      
> > windows
> >
> >
> >    
> >
> > > platforms and they see our green screens and say 'ewwwww'...
> > >
> > > They are the 'what I know is what I like' crowd, and they don't give a
> > >   
> > >
> > >      
> > hoot
> >
> >
> >    
> >
> > > about the tech behind the scenes. I read Nathans's article earlier this
> > > week and kudos to him for doing such a fine job of modernizing apps and
> > > keeping everything on one platform. But in healthcare we have so many
> > > disparate systems running - some on the i, some in browsers, some in MS
> > >   
> > >
> > >      
> > SQL
> >
> >
> >    
> >
> > > environments, and some practice specific solutions and users like the
look
> > > and feel and intuitiveness of what they've learned using windows. And
when
> > > we suggest developing new apps they wonder why they can't have the
windows
> > > look and feel. That's not to say we've decided to go down the .net path,
> > > but only I've been asked to explore the possibilities.
> > >
> > > One of my first responses to him when he asked about .net was that I told
> > > him I quit writing MS Access applications after Office 2k came out
because
> > > starting with Access95 and then Access97 and then Access2k, every time I
> > > upgraded office I had to rewrite those apps because the upgrade broke
them
> > > - and I certainly don't want that hassle if that's the case with Visual
> > > Studio and .net.
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >