× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I haven't tried it with two separate batch files, but I did put an "ls" before and after the "get *" line, just to see what would happen. I don't see an extra splf based on the "ls" line, just the output including "File not found" for the get. Being sftp -b, there is no processing of results along the way. It's much like the old FTP script with overriding the INPUT and OUTPUT, and hoping for the best.
--
Sean Porterfield

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gary Thompson
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 16:29
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: sftp error in batch when no files to transfer

Sean,
Forgive me if I am not following this thread, but I was thinking "ls" would precede get * and, depending on that result, the script would exit without attempting get *



-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Porterfield, Sean
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 2:18 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: sftp error in batch when no files to transfer

I actually tried adding a line with just "ls" after the "get *" in the scriptfile, and it still ended in error as soon as it ran the "get *"
--
Sean Porterfield


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles Sallee
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 16:15
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: sftp error in batch when no files to transfer

I don't use PASE much but for my FTPs, I check the download file record count. Maybe you could check the record count of the downloaded file and if the record count is > 0, ignore the error?



Thanks,

Chuck Sallee
CIS Manager
Lexington Division of Police
csallee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:csallee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


This email is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged. If you have received this message in error or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately and delete this email message from your computer as any and all unauthorized distribution or use of this message is strictly prohibited. Thank you.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.