× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I gave up on spool files long ago. I got tired of trying to figure out
where IBM had the information I needed whenever a new release came out.
And trying to have programs extract information from spool files and still
work on multiple releases. I've got enough stress on a new release and I
don't need to worry about spool file layout. Or trying to read outfiles
that may have their format change with a new release. Granted IBM
'mostly' does a good job in adding new fields to the end so you can work
around format level checks. But that can get ridiculous too - like
instead of telling us the object size you now have to multiple this field
by that field to get the object size.

Sample on that spool file that was really frustrating was trying to use
WRKSYSSTS to a spool to get the size of the system ASP. Remember jumping
from MB to GB? That's how long ago I gave up on spool file extraction.


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.