Re: 3573 half high drives slower

[Roberto José Etcheverry Romero <yggdrasil.raiker@xxxxxxxxx>]

indeed, HH are slower. But according to Quantum, LTO5 drives have the
same transfer rate in either version. weird...
http://www.sunstarco.com/tape%20drives/HP/HP_LTO3_Tape_Drives.htm
Posts speeds for LTO3 drives...

Best Regards,

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM,  <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> we have a 3573 with two half high scsi LTO3 drives attached to 2 different
> lpars.  We have two other 3573's with full height scsi LTO3 drives in
> each.  An INZTAP with CLEAR(*YES) repeatedly takes a half hour longer on
> the two half high drives.
>
> Is this documented somewhere?  Like throughputs of half high vs full
> height?
>
>
> Rob Berendt
> --
> IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1
> Group Dekko
> Dept 1600
> Mail to:  2505 Dekko Drive
>          Garrett, IN 46738
> Ship to:  Dock 108
>          6928N 400E
>          Kendallville, IN 46755
> http://www.dekko.com
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.