Re: 3573 half high drives slower -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

indeed, HH are slower. But according to Quantum, LTO5 drives have the
same transfer rate in either version. weird...
http://www.sunstarco.com/tape%20drives/HP/HP_LTO3_Tape_Drives.htm
Posts speeds for LTO3 drives...

Best Regards,

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

we have a 3573 with two half high scsi LTO3 drives attached to 2 different
lpars. We have two other 3573's with full height scsi LTO3 drives in
each. An INZTAP with CLEAR(*YES) repeatedly takes a half hour longer on
the two half high drives.

Is this documented somewhere? Like throughputs of half high vs full
height?

Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1
Group Dekko
Dept 1600
Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.