Thanks Gary and Rob. We use some of the commands in production but we do it using adopt authority. My interest is in knowing how you folks secure the commands...public *USE is definitely not what I want.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: rob <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thu, May 17, 2012 7:41 am
Subject: Re: RMTCMD's security?
We leave the default security on those commands. We actually use them in
rograms to fire off processes on PC servers.
ob Berendt
-
BM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1
roup Dekko
ept 1600
ail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
hip to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
ttp://www.dekko.com
From: fbocch2595@xxxxxxx
o: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
ate: 05/16/2012 04:11 PM
ubject: RMTCMD's security?
ent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
i Folks, are many of you securing these commands, SBMRMTCMD, etc. so as
o change from the default of *USE for public? Do you see a risk in your
sers using RMTCMD's from a test i to a production i?
hanks, Frank
-
his is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
ist
o post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
o subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
isit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
r email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
efore posting, please take a moment to review the archives
t
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
-
his is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
o post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
o subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
isit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
r email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
efore posting, please take a moment to review the archives
t
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
midrange.com
