Though early Windows were extensions of DOS in a similar way that the
X Window System extended Unix, it doesn't change the fact that Windows
existed before 3.1.

I do have to agree with Jerry that very few people are familiar with
versions 1 and 2, so I understand why he started there.

Add me to the list of people who bought and tried Windows 1.0, 2.0,
and 3.0, but like many others it didn't become my primary interface
until 3.1. Windows for Workgroups 3.11 was a nice improvement too,
for only being 3.1 to 3.11 in the numbering scheme.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].