× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



James,

Once you go "off format" by doing a SST or CONCAT, you must specify the
fields individually. It's an old nuisance.

-mark

I need to set up a logical file that is uniquely keyed on one of the PF
fields, but which omits all records in which that field is either blank,
or starts with an asterisk.

But I find that if I explicitly define a field substringing that field
(to check for the asterisk), I lose all the PF fields.

If there's a way to do this without explicitly including all of the PF
fields, I don't remember what it is.

Help?

--
JHHL


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.