|
I thought I understood you clearly at first and I was going to reply:
Thank you Sue. We were thinking the opposite, meaning, we were thinking
of having STRSST lower than QSTGLOWLMT because of that draconian
QSTGLOWACN value of *ENDSYS. Perhaps if we stuck to *MSG or *CRITMSG then
a lower QSTGLOWLMT than STRSST makes sense.
But then I got myself confused again. Let's blame it on QSTGLOWLMT being
percent available and SST being percent used. So are you saying we should
set QSTGLOWLMT to something like 10-20% available and have STRSST set to
91-95% used? So when QSTGLOWLMT is hit then a QSTGLOWACN of *MSG or
*CRITMSG kicks in and then if no appropriate action is performed then SST
kicks in and shuts down a few operations.
If we use *MSG for QSTGLOWACN then QSYSOPR and QSYSMSG both will get
CPI099C - Critical storage lower limit reached. at the lower percentage
and then later SST will kick in and QSYSOPR and QSYSMSG will both get
CPF0907 - Serious storage condition may exist. Press HELP. Along with SST
killing operations like: FTP, SNDDST, SNDNETF, and more.
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.