Re: Finer points of named activation groups -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Sounds like somewhere in the job stream there's a RCLACTGRP *ELIGIBLE....

Which is a horrible idea to have in "production" code and bad idea to
use even in development. (Per Barbara)

Charles

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:11 PM, James Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm just now starting to experiment with named activation groups. So
far, everything seems to be behaving as expected, EXCEPT

I'm finding that under certain circumstances, my named activation group
is disappearing from the job's activation group list, even though I'm
not RCLACTGRPing it, and nothing else should even be aware of its existence.

Can anybody shed any light on this?

--
JHHL
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.