|
Hee hee.
Yeah, the administration looking out for you! Notice, though, that they
won't veto the bill. They just won't "support" it. Remind you of
anything? Like signing the NDAA but saying it won't be used?
When SOPA and PIPA raise more concern than NDAA, I can't help but find
it ironic. You think it's bad that an unelected official can shut down
your website? How about one that can arrest and detain you indefinitely?
And just to be clear, it was the administration that made sure that NDAA
applied to US Citizens on US soil:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/14/1045331/-Sen-Levin-Charging-That-Obama-Asked-for-Americans-be-Subject-to-Life-Long-Military-Detention
Note: KOS isn't exactly a Tea Party extremist site. :)
Joe
This is from Electronic Freedom Foundation:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/how-pipa-and-sopa-violate-white-house-principles-supporting-free-speech
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
