|
I don't think it is overkill. I was about to sugest to use a "capcha".
Barry L. Kline wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2012 02:18 PM, paul therrien wrote:
For really important stuff you make the user actually key in theYears ago I had an inventory clerk who repeatedly accidentally ran
word 'YES' or 'DELETE' --- don't take ENTER for an answer! :-)
"year-end", which resulted in a significant amount of work to fix.
(This was on a System/34). My solution was to add a prompt asking him
if he actually wanted to run it, requiring "YES" as a response. He
unceremoniously keyed YES and ran the wrong thing anyway. So I added
another iteration of it. He screwed it up again. I added another...
and again another failure. After the third time I generated a
random 32-digit number and required him to key that in as the final
"launch code." Problem solved.
Okay, perhaps it was overkill but I was starting to get really annoyed.
Regards,
Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFPC2X0CFu3bIiwtTARAoSKAJ9Q7Br8qZTFrklJ8NEFhzZTVl+ktgCgq8W2
O70TpI872jEHW8IkzpZKvu4=
=Fg6N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.