×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
So just to update you all with the resolution here. I contacted IBM and
they had me download a test PTF that has a tool for cleaning up SNADS
distributions. I had to run 4 commands, some of which ran for a few
hours. The final step which deleted the identified objects took 10
hours to run. The result was that they recovered the "missing" space.
They were at 76% when the process started and it was reduced to 63% of
493.9 G total. That 13% reduction roughly matches the 15% that
PRTDSKINF showed was allocated to SNADS, etc.
FYI - Just in case someone else runs into the same situation
Pete Helgren
Value Added Software, Inc
www.petesworkshop.com
GIAC Secure Software Programmer-Java
On 10/12/2011 7:53 PM, Pete Helgren wrote:
SNADS and object distribution 14.93% 73762.36MB
73 gig allocated to SNADS ! They don't even use SNADS and all my
probings have failed to turn up just where this stuff hangs out. My
guess is that this is collateral damage from the open relay.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
