× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



The few Java programs that I migrated from V6R1 to V7R1 work way faster than they were running before, and I just used the default classic jvm.

One thing though, is that java never-end programs will become *slow* (as if they were on V6R1) after a week or more active; just restart them every night and they will run as a charm.

jmerinoh

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dan Kimmel
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 3:51 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Java performance...

I've been doing quite a bit of Java performance observation lately. Java is faster on V6R1 and yes, the performance improvement is significant, particularly if you are also moving to the 32-bit J9 jvm. And yet, throughput on i doesn't improve much on SOME SYSTEMS. My applications do a lot of talking to each other through the TCP/IP stack and I suspect the problem is in that IP stack. On other systems, they just scream, even if they're using the classic 64 bit Java 1.4 jvm.

Depending on your system, you may still be underwhelmed.

Be sure to turn off the IPv6 stuff. Unless you have everything configured for IPv6, java web environments will bog down considerably.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wyatt, Chris (FGWA-IL)
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 3:16 PM
To: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Java performance...

Hello all,

We are running a java client/server app on the AS400/iSeries/System i/IBMi/Powerwhatevertheyrecallingitnow. (MAPICS/Infor ERP XA/whatevertheyrecallingitnow)

We're running the MAPICS client mostly from a MS Terminal Server next to the AS400. The TS is being accessed from a WAN basically all over the world.

With this setup, we have an absurd number of potential bottlenecks/slowdowns and etc. And we are having performance problems.

We're trying our best to drill into the performance problems in a systematic way but it's been difficult. But one of the things we've been looking at hard is the Java performance on the AS400.

Currently, we are at V5R4 of the OS. We've been told that upgrading to V6R1 will bring a large Java performance benefit.

My question: Have you found this to be the case?

Obviously, we'll be going to V6R1 eventually anyway. But it would be nice if we could look forward to Java performance improvement.

Part of the reason I'm asking is that IBM always says the *next* version of the OS has incredible Java performance. And then we're always underwhelmed.

Thank you.

PS: I'd love to hear any tips you may have on our situation.

Chris Wyatt
ERP Developer/Analyst
FleetwoodGoldcoWyard
A Barry-Wehmiller Company

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.