Perhaps, but in that case you're actually doing an "extending subfile".

The system has to reallocate the buffer every time the subfile size is
too small for the next record. This adds overhead.

Using a SFLSIZ of 9999, means you've wasted space (& bandwidth?) and
also would impact the workings of the GUI scroll bars...

If you're doing a load all subfile, it's best to set the initial
subfile size to at least close to what the final size will be.

HTH,
Charles

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Gqcy <gmufasa01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
nope, it just needs to be 1 more than SFLPAG...

-gerald


On 4/15/2011 10:26 AM, Robert Rogerson wrote:
Hi Alan,

For a load all subfile shouldn't the SFLSIZ be 9999?

Robert Rogerson

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Alan Shore<ashore@xxxxxxxx>  wrote:


This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].