×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Perhaps, but in that case you're actually doing an "extending subfile".
The system has to reallocate the buffer every time the subfile size is
too small for the next record. This adds overhead.
Using a SFLSIZ of 9999, means you've wasted space (& bandwidth?) and
also would impact the workings of the GUI scroll bars...
If you're doing a load all subfile, it's best to set the initial
subfile size to at least close to what the final size will be.
HTH,
Charles
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Gqcy <gmufasa01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
nope, it just needs to be 1 more than SFLPAG...
-gerald
On 4/15/2011 10:26 AM, Robert Rogerson wrote:
Hi Alan,
For a load all subfile shouldn't the SFLSIZ be 9999?
Robert Rogerson
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Alan Shore<ashore@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
