User Space for mine. Between the EDTF function and the
STORAGE(*DEFINED) support in CL I much prefer them over data areas.


On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:57 AM, James Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I had thought of using a data area, and using the same pointer
resolution techniques we used to use for handling unrecognized terminal
types (and allowing users to define them in a data area).

But when I implemented this option, I was rather violently reminded of
why I yanked that code out, once (thanks to IBM ceasing the development
of new Twinax terminals) it had outlived its usfulness: Data areas are
system-domain, and attempting to get a pointer to one at Sec40 throws an
access exception.

I could always still use a data area, using QWCRDTAA to examine it, but
does anybody know of a better solution?

--
JHHL





This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].