|
In talking to the developer, it seems to me that we can simply have
[<ed> two] copies of the transmission file, the old 7p0 one and a new
10a one. The program containing the CPYF will be included in the
changes rolled to the field boxes to copy from the file [<ed> with
the matching record format].
So the resolution is to attempt two CPYF, ignoring the request which
fails due to the condition CPF2960 RC1 and thus CPF2963.?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.