×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
In addition, SQL tables have advantages in terms of performance, and
indexes, as well. Also, I think there is data validation that has
changed and is more likely to prevent input errors.
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246393.pdf is a book on
database modernization. It presents some of the pros and cons. It's
worth a read. Birgitta Hauser, who contributes to these lists, is one of
the authors. And Daniel Cruikshank, who has some things at Centerfield
Technology's site, as well as other presentation on database performance
-
http://www.centerfieldtechnology.com/events.asp will take you to a
list on the left of interest here.
Vern
On 2/1/2011 4:14 PM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
DDS is only easier if you limit yourself to those features that DDS
supports. How does one define constraints in DDS? You CANNOT! ADDPFCST
is not a DDS keyword.
Rob Berendt
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
