Re: Executable commands vs. programming commands -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Executable commands vs. programming commands
From: "sjl" <sjl_abc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:18:12 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

David -

AFAIK, not identifiable by object attributes or display command information,
but IIRC IBM publishes a list of such commands in one of the manuals.

-sjl

David wrote:

Folks:

Does anyone know if there is an easy way to identify commands,
based on attributes, that actually execute programs
vs. those that are just used for CL programs?

Example:

PGM, ENDPGM, & DCL are programming only commands.
RTVJOBA, CRTPGM, DLTF are executable commands.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.