Re: OS400/Unix authority settings

I totally agree.











-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Adams <Jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, Dec 17, 2010 11:36 am
Subject: RE: OS400/Unix authority settings


I must say, that's odd. Our customers dictated to us how and when to send them
nformation (usually EDI). If we had said, No, we'll do it this way, they would
ave looked for a new supplier (which, of course, they are doing now for other
easons).
Jerry C. Adams
BM System i Programmer/Analyst
cannot imagine any condition which could cause this ship to founder. I cannot
onceive of any vital disaster happening to the vessel. Modern shipbuilding has
one beyond that. -E.IO. Smith, captain of the Titanic
-
&W Wholesale
ffice: 615-995-7024
mail: jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

----Original Message-----
rom: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
n Behalf Of fbocch2595@xxxxxxx
ent: Friday, December 17, 2010 6:59 AM
o: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
ubject: Re: OS400/Unix authority settings

ou said "Changes made to permissions on your system will not carry forward
lsewhere" and while that makes sense and none of our other biz partners
omplain about the files we send this one requires me to change the
ermissions...we are their customer but they call the shots.




----Original Message-----
rom: Dennis Lovelady <iseries@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
o: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
ent: Thu, Dec 16, 2010 9:30 pm
ubject: RE: OS400/Unix authority settings

ut the caveat here (and maybe someone already said it; sorry if I missed
) is that regardless the permissions on your system, when you send them
a FTP they will be set to that system's default umask. Changes made to
rmissions on your system will not carry forward elsewhere. If you're
nding another way (scp, for example, or via zip/tar file to be extracted)
ings may be different.
ennis Lovelady
tp://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady

thing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.
You don't even have to go into the QShell environment - you can run the
qsh command simply from CL, as there

strqsh cmd('chmod 644 filename')

That's it. This always returns a QSH0005 message as a completion
message
by default. You might want to set an environment variable, so that an
error condition comes back as an escape message. The environment
variable is QIBM_QSH_CMD_ESCAPE_MSG and needs to be set to 'Y' to get
the escape message QSH0005 (when return status is > 0)

The first number is permissions for the owner of the object (read/write,
or *RW in CHGAUT, although I don't know if CHGAUT can set the unix
permissions the same way). The second number is for groups - a unix
group, there are some equivalents in IFS. It is read in this case. The
last number is for others - *PUBLIC is exactly the same - and is read
in
this case.

read = 4
write = 2
execute = 1

You add up what you want and use that number. There are several other
syntactical ways to do this in the chmod utility. There's a QShell
manual in InfoCenter.

On 12/16/2010 2:46 PM, fbocch2595@xxxxxxx wrote:

So, you think just strqsh then chmod 644 filename will do it? That's

not too painful, I guess.

-----Original Message-----
From: BMay@xxxxxxxxx
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thu, Dec 16, 2010 3:15 pm
Subject: Re: OS400/Unix authority settings


The simplest and fastest way to give them exactly what they want is

to use

he chmod command in Qshell or PASE. So you could use QP2SHELL or

STRQSH

o issue the command "chmod 644 filename"
That's of the top of my head, I am not where I can test it at the

moment.

Brian May
roject Lead
anagement Information Systems
aran, Incorporated
tarkville, Mississippi

fbocch2595@xxxxxxx
ent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
2/16/2010 01:57 PM
lease respond to
idrange Systems Technical Discussion<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

o
idrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
c
Subject
S400/Unix authority settings



Hi Folks, Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays!
I'm working with a biz partner who's requiring the permissions on IFS
iles to be set to
44(rw-r--r--) on files that I send to his system from our AS400's.
What would be the IFS authority settings, if any, that would

correspond to

44(rw-r--r--)? Is there any place to find that info?
Thanks, Frank

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
-
is is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
sit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
fore posting, please take a moment to review the archives
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.