|
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:48:04 -0500, Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Good suggestion. It should be noted that unless you're using
encrypted sessions, bypassing sign-on is actually more secure than
presenting the non-encrypted 5250 signon screen.
HTH,
Charles
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.