×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I've done this before. CLRPFM needs to be able to get an exclusive lock
on the file. The SQL DELETE can remove the records without and object
lock (there just can't be record locks). I haven't tested in a while, but
I'm almost positive that CLRPFM is much faster than SQL DELETE, especially
on large files.
Brian May
Project Lead
Management Information Systems
Garan, Incorporated
Starkville, Mississippi
Richard Reeve <richreeve@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
10/14/2010 10:15 AM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To
midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Perfromance of SQL DELETE vs clrpfm
I just came across a program(CL) that uses the delete function within SQL
to
clear a file and that made me wonder if it is more efficient to do a
CLRPFM or
if the SQL delete would be as efficient.
Any thoughts/experiences?
Warmest Regards,
Richard Reeve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This thread ...
Re: Perfromance of SQL DELETE vs clrpfm, (continued)
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
