Re: Sequence of WRKSPLF output?

["Bob P. Roche" <BRoche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If f File was on hold and then released it will be last the queue 
regardless of it created date/time. The queue order besides priority level 
of files is usually FIFO.



From:
Jack Kingsley <iseriesflorida@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
09/23/2010 03:50 PM
Subject:
Re: Sequence of WRKSPLF output?
Sent by:
<midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



Maybe printer file order first A-Z.

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Dennis Lovelady 
<iseries@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Hi, Folks:
>
>
>
> We have a WRKSPLF workalike-plus-extras program, and it has been serving
> our
> needs fairly well.  We found, though, that the output sequence of the
> in-house command does not match the sequence  presented in the IBM 
version.
> Further, the sequence presented in the IBM version doesn't match the 
result
> of QUSLSPL for any particular user.
>
>
>
> We've known for years that SAV/HLD are shown last, and we thought that
> within that list the files were presented in priority sequence and then 
in
> opened sequence (Created date/time).  But when we do (IBM's) WRKSPLF
> username OUTPUT(*PRINT) we are unable to determine the sort order (this 
is
> on a V5R3 system).
>
>
>
> http://code.midrange.com/1e37238551.html shows the point of question.
>  This
> is extracted from page 1 of WRKSPLF output for a certain user.  Notice 
the
> create date/time of the last entry.  I was tempted to think job 
number/name
> may come into play here, but one can see that there are two entries for
> each
> of two jobs, and the order is JOB1 JOB2 JOB2 JOB1.
>
>
>
> So have any of you landed on an exact sort order that's used by this
> command?  Have any of you any idea why that output's sequence would be
> different from QUSLSPL output?
>
>
>
> Dennis E. Lovelady
> AIM/Skype: delovelady      MSN: fastcounter@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady>
> www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady --
> "I either want less corruption, or more chance to participate in it."
>       - Ashleigh Brilliant
>
>
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.