×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 03/08/2010, at 6:35 AM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
1. There is absolutely nothing to be gained by having two mutually
redundant power supplies tied to the same source; it defeats the whole
purpose of having two mutually redundant power supplies.
Of course there is. Redundant power supply units are to protect
against failure of one power supply unit. They are not intended to be
fed with two independent sources of electricity. You can do that but
as Larry pointed out you'll just confuse the system into thinking a
power supply unit has failed when really it's just that one source of
electricity has failed. A UPS (plus optional generator) is intended to
protect you from loss of electricity. Redundant power supply units are
not intended for that purpose.
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.