× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Simon says:

Take your choice--although I doubt you'll get yyyy/mm/dd accepted
because that's a dumb (and unsupported) format. You can get mm/dd/yyyy
to work but that's also a dumb format--it just happens to be a
supported one.

... and you would argue that dd.mm.yyyy makes more sense, Simon? Actually,
I know you would; I've seen your postings that say so. Pray, will you
please sell us "dumb" Americans (or at least this one) on the virtues of
that format? While I agree to a point that mm/dd/yyyy doesn't make much
sense I don't get how dd/mm/yyyy does.

Dennis Lovelady
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady
--
"... Man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins
because he had achieved so much... the wheel, New York, wars, and so on,
whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a
good time. But conversely the dolphins believed themselves to be more
intelligent than man for precisely the same reasons."
-- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.