RE: Using an SQL index over DDS file?

Could you consider that again please before you shoot me down???

i.e.
select alcono company, alwedt weekend_date
from rtapcal
group by alcono, alwedt
order by 1,2

results in

COMPANY WEEKEND_DATE
001 19,930,506
001 19,930,513
001 19,930,520
001 19,930,527
001 19,930,603
001 19,930,610
001 19,930,617
001 19,930,624
001 19,930,701
001 19,930,708
001 19,930,715
001 19,930,722
001 19,930,729
001 19,930,805
001 19,930,812
001 19,930,819
001 19,930,826
001 19,930,902
001 19,930,909

I'm not a complete moonron. I know sometings.


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles Wilt
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 2:57 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Using an SQL index over DDS file?

Actually no it won't.

Select distinct fld1, fl2
from file

would give one row in the results set for every combination of fld1, fld2

Select fld1, fl2
from file
group by fld1, fld2

would give you as many rows as the original table, with duplicates for
the rows with the same fld1, fld2.

In order for a solution using GROUP BY to work, you also need an
aggregate function of some sort...
Select fld1, fl2, count(*) as theCount
from file
group by fld1, fld2

HTH,
Charles

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Schutte, Michael D
<Michael_Schutte@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

One suggestion...

Do a select  group by query versus a select distinct.

Select  fld1, fld2

From file

Group by fld1, fld2

Would give the same requests as

Select distinct fld1, fld2

Just try to see if VE gives a different answer.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Loyd Goodbar
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 2:25 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Using an SQL index over DDS file?

Thanks for the replies.

Luis, index advisor does not recommend any indexes. If I put a qualifier in
the select, such as "where i1azcd='WV'", VE shows the index in use but the
run time is the same, between 60 and 90 seconds. I was hoping that since I
select only the columns from the index it would perform much faster. As to
any gotchas, I was referring akin to runtime performance: will the query
perform differently because I call it from iNav or STRSQL or embedded?

Michael, I try to create new database objects with SQL. As you suggested, I
created a logical file. However, even selecting directly against the LF, VE
reports a table scan is performed.

Charles, there are 14 indexes on the table, including this one. Running the
query with STRDBG and STRSQL did not yield any messages or index advice. VE
reported the query optimizer did not time out. It reports "Indexes exist but
none could be used".


I can't do more testing until I reboot, as Run SQL Scripts now refuses to
run scripts or VE.

Thanks again,
Loyd
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.