× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



SAVF has more compression options than just *YES and *NO since maybe V5R3 -*HIGH, *MEDIUM, and *LOW. *HIGH often is very slow with little gain in compression over *MEDIUM. *LOW is not much better than *YES, as I recall - did a comparison maybe 7 years ago or so. I seem to recall that I published results in this mailing list.

The jar utility can also compress objects - it is essentially a ZIP file with an optional manifest and compression options. Might be worth a look, usable from qshell for sure. Haven't used it in forever, though.

Vern

On 7/20/2010 11:54 AM, Jon Paris wrote:
What's wrong with the built-in compression for save files Aaron? It
isn't quite as "tight" as pkzip etc. but close enough. I've had
situations in the past where zi
Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com



On Jul 20, 2010, at 9:44 AM, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

We would probably want a compression mechanism to
lessen the size of save files.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.