RE: Utility to remove and re-add logical file members

Sorry, Sharon, I didn't see the word 'consider' anywhere below. (Still
don't.) I saw 'you could,' which sounds unconditional, and which is why I
replied thus.

Dennis Lovelady
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady
--
"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what
the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be
replaced by something even more bizarrely inexplicable.

There is another theory which states that this has already happened."
-- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

That is one reason why I said consider it. Every shop has different
standards, so what works for one does not necessarily work for all.

Sometimes, a hint of a different approach is all someone needs to
reconsider their path.


Sharon Wintermute


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dennis Lovelady
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 11:24 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: Utility to remove and re-add logical file members

That's a good idea, Sharon, but MAINT(*REBUILD) is not an option when
UNIQUE
is involved. So there is some merit to the approach depending upon how
things are set up. Some installations that don't really understand
database
but are put in the position of designing for i have UNIQUE on (almost)
everything.

Dennis Lovelady
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady
--
Dear Lord, please make me the kind of person my cats think I am.

Rather than remove the members, you could just change the LF to
maint(*REBLD) instead of removing the members.

Then once you are done with the reorg, change them back to
maint(*Immed).

This way you don't lose the based-on member info. I have seen this
cause a problem when the logical is based on multiple physical

members.

Re-adding logical members isn't fun for multiple physical members.

Plus, if the LF has multiple members, its not fun either.



Sharon Wintermute