Not wanting to the the very old RLA vs. SQL discourse again, but surely it's
already been argued that for a single fetch, RLA will almost always win,
right?
Crispin.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Luis Rodriguez" <luisro58@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: System slow-down - disk usage?
Crispin,
The link was sent only as a reference of the benefits of using DDL-defined
tables/indexes vs DDS defined ones. It seems that the performance gains can
be quite significant and I thought this could be of interest in your
particular case.
On the other hand, I wonder what would happen if you substitute your
CHAIN/SETLL with a SQL SELECT?
And yes, the document is quite a bit dated, but most of the info is still (I
believe) worth it.
Best Regards,
Luis Rodriguez
IBM Certified Systems Expert — eServer i5 iSeries
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
