RE: Preparing to upgrade from V5R3M0 to V5R4M0

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Preparing to upgrade from V5R3M0 to V5R4M0 -
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:28:10 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Totally concur. There is NO reason, none, to install V5R4M0 of LIC. Use
V5R4M5. There should be no software compatibility issues between V5R4M0
and V5R4M5. There is no advantage to using V5R4M0, only disadvantages.
The biggest advantage to using V5R4M5 is that you can then restore on much
of the newer hardware. I upgraded a 270 to V5R4M5 and then restored it on
newer hardware and then quickly upgraded it to V6R1. It's now running
7.1.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.

RE: Preparing to upgrade from V5R3M0 to V5R4M0 -