× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Rick,

In your case, I'm afraid that the constraints would not apply...I think it
would only work if the check constraint can be seen as a subset of the
referential constraint. Maybe Rob's suggestion (triggers) would be more
helpful.

Regards,

Luis Rodriguez
IBM Certified Systems Expert — eServer i5 iSeries


On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:10 PM, <Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I can add the constraints but it doesn't do what I need it to. I have a
check constraint of 'V' or blank and a referential constraint of 'P' or 'H'
(more to come later). The 'V' and blank are hard coded into the program
depending on certain conditions. If the user chooses an override the 'P' or
'H' will be used. Unfortunately they appear to be mutually exclusive.

I tried inserting a row using SQL and if I use one of the referential
constraint values the insert fails due to the check constraint. If I use
one of the check constraint values the insert fails due to the referential
constraint. The value has to satisfy both constraints.

It makes sense, it just doesn't work for me in this case.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Luis Rodriguez
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:49 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Can I have check and referential constraint on same column?

Rick,

To check my answer I did a small test:

ALTER TABLE MyLib/File1
ADD Constraint FK_CardType
FOREIGN KEY (CardType)
REFERENCES MyLib/File2 (CardType) ;

ALTER TABLE File1 ADD CHECK (CardType <> 9 ) ;

No problem in creating both constraints. Even if there is a CARDTYPE 9 in
File2, I can't insert a CARDTYPE 9 record in File1. The system returns
CPF502F (Check constraint violation).

Did not check what happens the CHECK constraint is created before the
foreign key...

HTH,
Luis Rodriguez
IBM Certified Systems Expert - eServer i5 iSeries

Privileged and Confidential. This e-mail, and any attachments there to,
is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please notify me immediately by a return e-mail and delete this
e-mail. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail and/or any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.