×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




John,

You are exactly right in what should be done for tape management.
You would be surprised how many places do what your shop does.

Pete

Pete Massiello
iTech Solutions
http://www.itechsol.com

Add iTech Solutions on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126431824120
Add iTech Solutions on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2206093





-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jmmckee
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 1:30 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Ultrium 4 Tape Initialization

Really annoys me that procedure where I work is to initialize the tape every
night. Old habits die painfully hard. I have suggested that the expiration
date be changed from *PERM to a value more in line with the tape rotation.
That date could be generated from a CL program.

My biggest issue with continual tape initialization, beyond excessive wear
and tear (which is a big issue), is that the wrong tape could be pulled and
the data destroyed.

I have also complained that tapes should have unique volume numbers, not
stupid things like DAILY. But, nobody seems to care. I even showed them
PRTERRLOG output. And people wonder why things fail sometimes.

I worked in a bank thirty years ago that used 9 track tape. Only time tapes
were initialized was when the BOT marker was replaced.

John McKee


-----Original message-----
From: Simon Coulter shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 19:03:14 -0500
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Ultrium 4 Tape Initialization


On 15/05/2010, at 5:35 AM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

But on a nightly
basis you do not need to run CLEAR(*YES). You will still have all the
tape space available if you run CLEAR(*NO). Basically it wiped out
the
header and goes from there. Trust me, it just works. We've been
doing
this for decades.

But why, on a nightly basis, do so many of you run INZTAP anyway? Just
start the save at sequence 1 and let the save overwrite the previous
data. By constantly running INZTAP you:
a) wear out the start of the tape :)
and
b) mess up the read/write error statistics for the tape.

Sure, initialise and clear a tape prior to disposing of it but
otherwise a tape should be initialised once and just reused.

Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists

http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.