Re: More fun with native RLA on an SQL view vs Re: MIDRANGE-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 748

Jon Paris wrote:

On May 3, 2010, at 10:32 PM, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:

Interesting, since I'm just about certain that MI is calling
the same thing an RPG SETLL calls, rather than what an RPG
CHAIN calls.

Just a thought - but why not modify the RPG test program to
compile in RPG400. If it produces the same results as the ILE
version (and I would expect it to) you can now view the listing
of the generated MI and see exactly how the compiler's approach
differs from your own.

The OP made a statement earlier, that the SETLL *START was not allowed, except in ILE RPG. Perhaps that explains why.?
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201005/msg00029.html

p.s. The subject line of the message thread was "More fun with native RLA on an SQL view", rather than what was the subject line of the digest. Messages will not thread properly in the archive without maintaining the original subject line. See:
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201005/threads.html#00029

p.p.s. Who wrote the quoted message was "James H. H. Lampert", not "midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx". If the subject line is incorrect such that the archival will not properly thread the message, then also having incorrect attribution further devalues the existence of the reply in the archive.

Regards, Chuck