RE: Java performance on the i ? Good? bad? OK? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de john e

Scott,
I really thought *you* didn't do FUD.
Java sucks on the i, maybe, but "in general"... please
elaborate.Maybe you mean Java EE sucks... or WAS sucks,
JSF... What does "in general" mean, with such a vast Java ecosystem.
If you mean that the JVM sucks, in general, performance wise,
then you probably didn't really look for the last 10 years.

Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:44:25 -0600
From: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Java performance on the i ? Good? bad? OK?

The proper response is: "Java, in general, sucks. Here's

a spatula!"

I too raised my eyebrows on reading that from the great man himself. Especially as I've just started delving into POI for RPG. But, I decided that this must be an americanism that I didn't quite understand.

PS Scott, will you be filming at Common again? If so I will be looking forward to "meeting" the contributors to this list. Virtually, of course.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.