× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Chris,

I think the JVM *IS* buried in MI...

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v5r4/topic/rzaha/jnmipe
rf.htm

Java Native Method Invocation performance considerations

Native method invocation on an iSeries(tm) server may not perform as
well as native method invocation on other platforms.

Java(tm) on the System i5(tm) has been optimized by moving the Java
virtual machine below the machine interface (MI). Native method
invocation requires a call to above MI code and may require expensive
Java Native Interface (JNI) calls back into the Java virtual machine.
Native methods should not carry out small routines, which you can easily
write in Java. Only use native methods to start system functions that
are relatively long running and are not available directly in Java.

-Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Bipes
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:13 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Java performance on the i ? Good? bad? OK?

Any generic Virtual Machine that is ported to all possible OS' sucks.
JAVA is a brown liquid that is meant to be consumed, Not to consume all
of your computer resources.

As a employee of a privately owned company, I would not program in JAVA
for any of our systems. I try to stay away from 3rd party applications
that are written generically. Native is always better than VM.

Now if IBM integrates JAVA into the MI layer, that would be a whole new
ball game.

Chris Bipes
Director of Information Services
CrossCheck, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Klement
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:44 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Java performance on the i ? Good? bad? OK?

The proper response is: "Java, in general, sucks. Here's a spatula!"


On 2/4/2010 3:25 PM, Booth Martin wrote:
Java performance on the i ? Good? Bad? OK?

I am being told that "Java on the i sucks." What is the proper
response?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.