×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I had a problem with the "select from final table" statement soon after we went to 6.1, December 2008. It worked fine on the dev box and if we manually SAVRSTed the program object to the production box it would work correctly. But when Turnover did the promotion (SAVRSTed the program object) it would fail looking for the development library it was created in, as I remember. Our System i DBA (yes we have one) was dealing with other problems at the time and I could work around the problem by using the previous syntax so he didn't peruse the issue.
Reading this thread reminded me and our DBA and I are now going to re-investigate the problem and take it up with Turnover/IBM, assuming it still exists.
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 8:07 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: IDENTITY_VAL_LOCAL
Study hard Chuck's recommendation of the 6.1 "select from insert". This is what your developers want.
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
