Re: NFS copy issue -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: NFS copy issue
From: Lukas Beeler <lukas.beeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:55:38 +0100
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 20:52, Bob P. Roche <BRoche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I wish disk space cost less per GB If it was comparable to PC's I could
just get a 1TB drive and forget about the whole NFS share.

Instead of this, talk with IBM how comparable System x drives are
priced. It might make things take longer, but you'll be able to cut
down IBM's margin from 500% to a measly 100% per drive ;)

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.