× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Luis Rodriguez <luisro58@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also, regarding your question about EVIs, you could use the WITH n DISTINCT
VALUES clause when defining the EVI. Just leave the necessary safety margin
(say, With 4 DISTINCT VALUES). The only difference is that the EVI size
would be a little more bigger.

No it won't.

there's no different between
WITH 2 DISTINCT VALUES
WITH 4 DISTINCT VALUES
WITH 100 DISTINCT VALUES

In each case, the EVI byte code size is 1 byte.

On the other hand,
WITH 300 DISTINCT VALUES

Gives you a EVI byte code size of 2 bytes.

HTH,
Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.