×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
What makes the given situation especially confusing, is that
there are two [or more; depending on perspective] "close errors"
being diagnosed. The first close error is for a database file
QAOSSI12 as implementation object. That "database close" error just
happens to occur during the "DLO close" processing, which sensibly
is manifest as an error in closing the STMF in the /QDLS. That the
STMF was accessed via the generic IFS access methods by\in the FTP
session, versus by the DLO-specific access methods, the FTP failures
are manifest as the more generic IFS close errors. And even that
errno is just replacement text as part of the FTP-specific error
message for its "close" processing.
Since the error was during close processing [of the file target
of the GET (REPLACE], then as long as no records were lost [e.g. for
buffered records not written as part of the close; or perhaps just
records unavailable to other threads as with row locking], the
/logical condition/ of the file being left "open" could easily be
innocuous. Thus that the GET would seem to have been effected
sufficiently to be considered successful is not so strange.
However the failure to close could still become a problem, while
the open as a logical condition remains, for presenting a conflict
with _other_ operations that might be attempted later. For example
a failed close which leaves a file "open" would often preclude
operations such as delete of the file object. Since the FTP is
record transport and thus the (REPLACE of the GET applies to the
data versus the object, all of the data could be replaced
successfully so the failure to close could remain a non-issue.
Unfortunately a failed open of the DLO could obfuscate the error
with the implementation object, since for example a DLTDLO might be
manifest as an allocation error [per "not closed"] irrespective of
the origin of the error(s) with the implementation object [which
although since determined to be an allocation error, could have been
any error during the fclose()].
Regards, Chuck
brad_bird wrote:
Our backups finished and we still got the error. We had
to initiate a second process to get the upload files and
it worked fine; even though this error job was still
reporting errors. Strange.
Jack Kingsley wrote:
Brad, not hitting a lib/file/member that is in use and or
locked via maybe off hours backup.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:52 AM, brad_bird wrote:
During our nightly polling, we starting getting a "Unable to
close file. Error code CPE3006" on upload but yet all download
files were sent successfully. This is a portion of the FTP
output log and program log for the error. Anyone have any idea
on the cause?
get FIN.DSS (REPLACE
227 Entering Passive Mode (<ip-address-removed>).
125 Data connection already open; Transfer starting.
Unable to close file. Error code CPE3006.
226 Transfer complete.
225 ABOR command successful.
<<SNIP>>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.