Re: SSD vs HDD -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: SSD vs HDD
From: Lukas Beeler <lukas.beeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:14:29 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 16:59, <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The files on HDD were journaled. ÂThe data on the SSD was not because we
had our journals and receivers back on *SYSASP and it didn't link them up
when we restored the library on the SSDs.

I have no idea what kind of benchmarks these things were, but what
does this tell us?

Journalled databases on HDDs are slower than unjournalled databases on SSD?

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.